Tradition
Classical
Tradition
Life
and time of sankardeva and his
apostles.
Literary
works of sankardeva
Philosophy
of Sankardeva
Faith
and tenets
Manuscript
Painting
Art and craft
of Sattra
institute
Sankardeva
Movement
Folk
and ethinic tradition
Moran
and Motok
Glimpses
of Moran culture
Taiphake
Singphos
Bodos
Sonowal
kacharis
Karbi
Mishing
Positive
vibes...On current events
Personalities
Views
Room
Gateway
of Assam
Rediscovering the Core
|
|
Manuscript
Painting:
contd..
One of the major contributions to the art
of painting in Assam was the Lava kusar yuddha. The manuscript is
undated. Its pictorial style is developed better than that of the
Citra bhagavata and those executed between 1683 and 1732 A.D.
The illustrious Ahom King, Svargadeo Rudra Sinha
(1695-1713 A.D), commissioned the services from artists outside the
Ahom kingdom, rehabilitated them in his court to constitute the royal
atelier. One of the artists produced the paintings of the Gajendra
-cintamani in 1713 A.D. Its text was again illustrated in 1734 A.D.
under the title Hastividyarnava by Dilbar and Dosai. Another copy
of the Hastividyarnava was illustrated during late 18th century by
an unknown artist well-versed in the court palette. The manuscript
is presently owned by Auniati-sattra in Majuli.
The region of the Ahom king, Svargadeo Siva
Simha, was remarkable for his patronage towards the development
of the court style of painting. He supported the rendering of as
many as six manuscripts in line and colour. The manuscripts are
the Sankhacudavadha (1726), Brihatushagita (1730), Hastividyarnava
(1734), Dharmapurana ,(1735),Bhagavatapurana VI (1737) and Saila
parva (1735-1744).
The emergence of Chaliha Bareghar sastta
as the house of artists in the very vicinity of the Ahom capital
at Gargaon enriched the satriya school with its contributions of
Visnurana"s Ajamilopakhyananata (1715), Adhyatma-ramayana (a few
folios have survived) and Purnakama"s Sundarakanda (1767) of the
Adhyatma-ramayana. Purnakama"s Sundarakanda represents the grand
assimilation not only of the local court and the sattriya styles
but also several elements derived from different schools of Indian
painting.
In 1769 the Moamariya rebels usurped the
Ahom throne and caused the collapse of the court atelier. Chaos
and restlessness continued to rule the society for several decades.
A few artists of the court moved to some sattras where they resumed
their work a new and produced the Udyogaparva, the Kirtana (1771)
of Checha sattra and the Sanskrit Bhagavata purana VI (1785) of
Karchung sattra. During the period of unrest in the Ahom territory,
the Darrang court under Krishnanarayana patronized and supported
a few artists of the sattriya tradition for rendering painting in
the paper of the Bhagavata purana, VIII (1804), Tirtha-Kaumudi and
Anadi Patana. The style of these manuscripts present slovenly draughtmanship
and an inferior palette alongwith folk treatment of forms.
The 19th century, which was also a period
of unrest particularly its first few decades, contributed a lot
and enriched the repertoire of Assamese painting. The illustrated
Kirtana (1800) of Nogora-sattra, the Parijata harana (1836) of Ai-bheti
Na-sattra, the Bhakti pradipa and Nimi nava siddha samvada (1817)
of Samaguri-sattra are some of the examples worthmentioning. In
1836 the Ahom prince, Purandar Simha, whom the British company placed
on the throne for a very short period after the fall of the Ahom
kingdom during the Burmese aggression, commissioned the services
of one Durgaram Betha for illumination work in the folios of the
Brahmavaivarta purana (now in the British library,London). It was
a masterpiece of the 19th century. According to J.P. Losty, "this
is the last of the great ones, in which the native Assamese style
has triumphantly reasserted itself over the desiccated Ahom court
style" (Marg.Vol.XXXVI,No.1,p.27).
 
|

|